FEDERAL agriculture minister Murray Watt has given a robust defence of the government's new biosecurity levy.
Speaking at a Rural Press Club of Victoria breakfast, Melbourne recently, Mr Watt said the government had taken a range of decisive steps to protect the agriculture sector from what were "really serious" and growing biosecurity threats.
It has flagged a new levy from July 1 next year, intended to collect around $50 million per year.
"We have asked producers to pay a small biosecurity protection levy - our farmers should absolutely not bear the full cost of biosecurity operations," Mr Watt said.
"But I do think, as direct beneficiaries of the biosecurity system, it was reasonable to ask producers to make a small contribution towards the cost of those services that do protect their livelihoods."
Farmers have expressed fears the money will vanish into department coffers, rather than deliver tangible outcomes.
All of the National Farmers' Federation member groups voted to formally oppose the biosecurity levy, which will be "equivalent to 10 per cent of the 2020-21 levy rates".
Mr Watt told guests a dairy farmer would pay an extra 0.7 cents per kilogram of milk protein, for apple growers it was 0.18 cents a kilogram, while egg farmers would be asked to pay an extra 3c, per laying chick.
"What that means is farmers will be only paying 6 per cent of the total cost of our biosecurity services, with the vast majority being borne by taxpayers and importers," he said.
"I think it is a pretty small contribution we are asking producers to make.
Mr Watt said the model the government had come up with was to share the cost of providing biosecurity protection between taxpayers, risk creators and the direct beneficiaries of the system.
"Biosecurity is a shared responsibility, and that does apply to how we fund the system, going forward, as well," he said.
Overseas travellers would pay an extra $10 a ticket, in recognition of the risk created when they returned to Australia.
Fees for incoming mail had also been adjusted, he said
"We have lot more weird and not very wonderful stuff coming through our mail system," he said.
"Importers are paying a lot more than they have, in the past as well - we all have to pay our share.
"I really listened to the calls from producers groups about the need to make sure that importers do pay their fair share - the reality is, as much as they might try, they do create risks by bringing things in from overseas, in shipping containers and in other ways."
Importers were not paying the full cost of the services they received and taxpayers were picking up the bill.
"Cost recovery from importers has now reached $83.3 million, it's not about price gouging, or charging too much, it's about making sure they pay the full cost of the services they receive," he said.
Consultation on the new levy closed on Friday, October 13.
Sign up here to Good Fruit and Vegetables weekly newsletter for all the latest horticulture news each Thursday...